数据与计算发展前沿 ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1): 119-134.

CSTR: 32002.14.jfdc.CN10-1649/TP.2025.01.009

doi: 10.11871/jfdc.issn.2096-742X.2025.01.009

• 技术与应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

国内外经典工业互联网体系架构发展研究

王鹤子1(),张中献1,杨学2,*()   

  1. 1.中国互联网络信息中心,技术发展所,北京 100190
    2.中国互联网络信息中心,创新业务所,北京 100190
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-31 出版日期:2025-02-20 发布日期:2025-02-21
  • 通讯作者: *杨学(E-mail: yangx@cnnic.cn
  • 作者简介:王鹤子,中国互联网络信息中心,工程师,主要研究方向为信息系统、大数据分析技术、工业互联网及下一代互联网。
    负责论文初稿撰写和工业互联网架构发展与功能架构进行对比分析。
    WANG Hezi is an engineer at the China Internet Network Information Center. Her main research interests include information systems, industrial Internet, and the next-generation Internet.
    In this paper, she is responsible for the writing of the paper drafting and the comparative analysis of industrial Internet architecture development and functional architecture.
    E-mail: wanghezi@cnnic.cn|杨学,中国互联网络信息中心,创新业务所所长,高级工程师,CCF会员,研究方向为大数据分析技术、机器学习、区块链。
    负责制定论文框架,论文修改、审定。
    YANG Xue is a director of the Innovation Business Institute in China Internet Network Information Center. He is a senior engineer and a member of CCF. His research interests include big data analysis technologies, machine learning, and blockchain.
    In this paper, he is responsible for developing the framework, paper revision and approval.
    E-mail: yangx@cnnic.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2022YFB3105000)

Research on Global Classic Industrial Internet Architecture Development

WANG Hezi1(),ZHANG Zhongxian1,YANG Xue2,*()   

  1. 1. Department of technological development, CNNIC, Beijing 100190, China
    2. Department of innovative business, CNNIC, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2024-05-31 Online:2025-02-20 Published:2025-02-21

摘要:

【目的】对全球工业互联网体系架构发展状况进行介绍与分析,为中国工业互联网体系架构发展方向提供参考。【方法】通过梳理国内外工业互联网体系架构及功能发展现状,对比分析美国、德国、日本及中国的工业互联网体系架构异同与发展优劣势。【结果】国内外工业互联网架构体系发展路线基于各国的制造业特点与技术基础的优势,在发展条件、发展目标、应用领域等方面各有差异,对我国工业互联网架构发展有一定的经验借鉴价值。【结论】对我国工业互联网技术融合发展、标准化建设、平台建设、中小型科技企业发展的相关建议,但具体落地方法尚需进一步的探讨。

关键词: 工业互联网, 体系架构, 功能体系, 智能制造, 信息化

Abstract:

[Objective] This paper introduces and analyzes the development of global industrial Internet architecture, providing a reference for the development direction of China's industrial Internet architecture. [Methods] By reviewing the current status of industrial Internet architecture and function development at home and abroad, this paper compares the similarities and differences of several industrial Internet architectures and analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of the industrial Internet development in the United States, Germany, Japan, and China. [Results] The development of industrial Internet systems in each country is based on the characteristics of manufacturing industry and the technological advantages in each country. There are differences in development conditions, development goals, and application fields, which provides valuable references for the development of industrial Internet in China. [Conclusion] Suggestions on the development of integrated technologies, standards, platforms, and technological enterprises in China on industrial Internet are put forward, while the specific implementation still needs further discussion.

Key words: industrial internet, architecture, system function, intelligent manufacturing, informatization