数据与计算发展前沿 ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3): 191-202.

doi: 10.11871/jfdc.issn.2096-742X.2026.03.016

• 技术与应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

教育信息化多系统协同治理的挑战与优化路径研究——基于上海市教育系统的实证分析

罗屿冰*(),丁伟衡   

  1. 上海市大数据中心上海 200040
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-11 出版日期:2026-06-20 发布日期:2026-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 罗屿冰
  • 作者简介:罗屿冰,理学士,上海市大数据中心,工程师,主要研究方向包括大数据、项目管理、政务信息化。
    本文主要承担工作为负责研究框架设计、核心研究问题提出及关键理论模型的构建,主导整体研究思路的确定。
    LUO Yubing, holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) degree and is an engineer at Shanghai Municipal Big Data Center. Her research interests include big data, project management, and government informatization.
    In this paper, she is mainly responsible for designing the research framework, proposing core research questions, constructing key theoretical models, and leading the determination of the overall research approach.
    E-mail: ybluo@shanghai.gov.cn

Research on the Challenges and Optimization Paths of Multi-system Collaborative Governance in Educational Informatization—An Empirical Analysis Based on the Education System of Shanghai Municipality

LUO Yubing*(),DING Weiheng   

  1. Shanghai Municipal Big Data Center, Shanghai 200040, China
  • Received:2025-12-11 Online:2026-06-20 Published:2026-06-18
  • Contact: LUO Yubing

摘要:

【目的】聚焦教育信息化“多系统协同治理”核心难题,破解传统建设模式下的“信息孤岛”“烟囱效应”,为教育数字化转型提供可操作的“技术+治理”双轮驱动方案。 【文献范围】系统梳理国内外教育信息化治理、政务信息化整合模式、多系统协同治理理论缺口及可借鉴解决方案,涵盖中国“教育新基建”政策、欧盟、美国等地区法规标准。 【应用背景】以上海教育系统为实证场景,其面临系统碎片化、数据权属模糊、跨部门协同缺失、安全合规风险等典型问题,且已推进教育数字基座建设、“一数一源”治理等改革举措。 【方法】采用案例研究法,深度剖析上海教育信息化系统的治理现状与问题,构建融合“技术、管理、生态与安全”的系统性综合治理框架,包含统一技术底座、“三权分置”数据权属模型、“三级需求漏斗”协同机制等关键设计。 【结果】该框架在上海教育数字化转型实践中成效显著,有效提升了数据共享效率、系统交付速度与跨部门协同水平,成功规范了数据编目、归集、共享全流程,破解了多供应商协同治理困境。 【局限】研究样本聚焦上海(直辖市,管理模式扁平化),尚未充分适配不同区域的教育信息化特点;未深入探索AI大模型在智能治理中的实际应用场景。 【结论】本研究构建的综合治理框架为破解教育信息化“重建设、轻治理”痼疾提供了创新范式,明确了多系统协同治理的技术路径与管理机制,为区域及行业级数字化协同治理提供了理论支撑与实践参考。

关键词: 多系统协同治理, 教育数字化转型, 统一技术底座, 案例研究法

Abstract:

[Purpose] Focusing on the core challenge of “multi-system collaborative governance” in educational informatization, this study tackles “information silos”and “stovepipe effects” under traditional construction models, and provides an operable "technology+governance" dual-drive solution for educational digital transformation. [Literature Scope] This study systematically reviews domestic and international research on educational informatization governance, government informatization integration models, theoretical gaps in multi-system collaborative governance, and applicable solutions, covering China’s “New Infrastructure for Education” policy and regulatory standards of the EU, the US and other regions. [Application Background] Taking Shanghai’s education system as an empirical case, this study targets its typical problems: system fragmentation, ambiguous data ownership, insufficient cross-departmental collaboration, and security compliance risks. Shanghai has advanced reforms including educational digital infrastructure construction and “one data from one source” governance. [Method] Using the case study method, this study analyzes the current state of governance and existing problems of Shanghai’s educational informatization system, and constructs a systematic governance framework integrating “technology, management, ecology and security”, with key designs such as a unified technical base, a “separation of three rights” data ownership model, and a “three-level demand funnel” collaboration mechanism. [Results] The framework has achieved significant results in Shanghai’s educational digital transformation: it improves data sharing efficiency, system delivery speed and cross-departmental collaboration; standardizes the whole process of data cataloging, collection and sharing; and resolves the dilemma of multi-supplier collaborative governance. [Limitations] The research sample focuses on Shanghai (a municipality with a flat management model) and is not yet fully applicable to educational informatization characteristics in different regions. Additionally, it does not explore the practical application of large AI models in intelligent governance in depth. [Conclusion] The constructed governance framework provides an innovative paradigm to address the long-standing issue of “valuing construction over governance” in educational informatization. It clarifies the technical paths and management mechanisms of multi-system collaborative governance, offering theoretical support and practical reference for regional and industry-level digital collaborative governance.

Key words: multi-system collaborative governance, digital transformation in education, unified technical foundation, case study method