数字社会的技术基础设施、运行逻辑和治理现代化

doi:10.11871/jfdc.issn.2096-742X.2025.05.014

数据与计算发展前沿 ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (5): 173-183.

CSTR: 32002.14.jfdc.CN10-1649/TP.2025.05.014

doi: 10.11871/jfdc.issn.2096-742X.2025.05.014

数字社会的技术基础设施、运行逻辑和治理现代化

韩海庭¹(),孙茜^2,^*()

1.哥本哈根大学，区块链与电子市场研究中心，丹麦哥本哈根 FC1958
2.中国科学院大学，公共政策与管理学院，北京 100190

收稿日期:2025-01-01 出版日期:2025-10-20 发布日期:2025-10-23
通讯作者: 孙茜
作者简介:韩海庭，哥本哈根大学区块链与电子市场中心经济学家。致力于探索协议、经济制度、网络治理（资源/权力分配）与经济绩效之间的联系，并尝试基于分布式技术和智能合约设计一种新的经济系统-数据市场基础设施（DMIs）与电子市场模拟系统（EMSS）。研究兴趣包括网络物理系统（CPS）、数据治理以及分布式经济设计。
本文负责论文概念化提出，初稿撰写和修正。
HAN Haiting, PhD, is an economist at the Center for Blockchain and Electronic Markets at Copenhagen University. He is looking forward to finding the connection between Protocol, Economy Institutions, Cyber Governance (Resource/Powers Distribution), and Economic Performance. He is also attempting to design a new economic system based on distributed technology and smart contracts-Data Market Infrastructures (DMIs) and E-Market Simulator System (EMSS). His research interests include cyber-physical systems (CPS), Data Governance, and distributed economics design.
In this paper, he contributed to the conceptualization, drafting of the initial manuscript, and subsequent revisions.
E-mail: hanht@pku.edu.cn|孙茜，中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院副教授，博士。哥本哈根商学院博士后、哥本哈根商学院与中国科学院大学双博士，在Government Information Quarterly，Technological F-orecasting and Social Change 等重要国内外期刊发表一系列论文。主要研究领域：数字治理、数字创新、创新发展政策、数字医疗与养老、医疗人工智能、数字和智能驱动的新科研范式。
本文负责理论概念、初稿撰写、论文返修、基金支持。
SUN Qian, PhD, is an associate Professor at the School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS). She completed her postdoctoral research at Copenhagen Business School (CBS) and holds a double PhD degree from CBS and UCAS. Tara has published articles in international journals, including Government Information Quarterly and Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Her primary research interests include digital governance, digital innovation, innovation and development policy, artificial intelligence in healthcare and aging society, and AI-driven scientific research (AI4S).
In this paper, she contributed to theoretical framework, drafting the initial manuscript, revisions, and funding.
E-mail: sunqian@ucas.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金委员会青年科学基金项目(72404262);第十届中国科协青年人才托举工程;国家社科基金后期项目“个人信息保护与数据治理”(20FFXB068)

Digital Society: Technical Infrastructure, Operating Logic and Modernization of Governance

HAN Haiting¹(),SUN Qian^2,^*()

1. Center for Blockchain and Electronic Markets, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen FC1958, Denmark
2. School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2025-01-01 Online:2025-10-20 Published:2025-10-23
Contact: SUN Qian

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 在全球经济衰退、技术竞争加剧的大背景下，数字社会技术基础设施的建设和发展不仅对于对冲我国经济下行风险至关重要，还被寄希望于促进新质生产力的开发和领导未来网络空间秩序的建设，针对数字社会的创新治理也变得尤为重要。【方法】 在数字化转型背景下，本研究从身份、价值和治理对象三个方面提出创新数字社会治理的新模式。【结果】 用网络标识符取代公民行为者，用分布式匿名通信取代物理交易活动，用算法、协议和代码取代合同、道德和法律等传统社会制度，将是未来数字社会的重要标志，从而使社会治理变得可衡量和可模拟。【结论】 在此基础上，提出了数字身份治理、分布式账本价值管理和结果导向价值治理三种创新型社会治理新模式，为今后的研究提供一定的理论参考和研究思路。

关键词: 数字化转型, 数字基础设施, 数字社会, 创新治理

Abstract:

[Objective] This study examines the role of digital social infrastructure in today’s challenging context. Global economic slowdown and fierce technological competition make this infrastructure vital. It not only helps hedge China’s economic risks but also drives new productive forces and shapes the future order of cyberspace. As a result, innovative governance for the digital society has become essential. [Methods] Against the backdrop of digital transformation, we propose new governance models along three dimensions: identity, value, and governance targets. [Results] We show that the future digital society will be defined by three key shifts. First, network identifiers will replace traditional citizen actors. Second, distributed anonymous communication will take the place of physical transactions. Third, algorithms, protocols, and code will stand in for contracts, ethics, and laws. These changes will make social governance both measurable and simulatable. [Conclusions] Building on these insights, we introduce three innovative governance models: digital identity governance, distributed-ledger value management, and outcome-oriented value governance. Together, they provide theoretical foundations and new directions for future research.

Key words: digital transformation, digital infrastructure, digital society, innovative governance

韩海庭,孙茜. 数字社会的技术基础设施、运行逻辑和治理现代化[J]. 数据与计算发展前沿, 2025, 7(5): 173-183.

HAN Haiting,SUN Qian. Digital Society: Technical Infrastructure, Operating Logic and Modernization of Governance[J]. Frontiers of Data and Computing, 2025, 7(5): 173-183, https://cstr.cn/32002.14.jfdc.CN10-1649/TP.2025.05.014.

图/表 4

参考文献 32

[1]	凯文·凯利. 失控:全人类的最终命运和结局[M]. 北京: 中信出版社, 2010.
[2]	TEUBNER R A, STOCKHINGER J. Literature review: Understanding information systems strategy in the digital age[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2020, 29(4): 101642.
[3]	BHARADWAj A, EL SAWY O A, PAVLOU P A, et al. Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2013, 37(2): 471-482.
[4]	NAMBISAN S, WRIGHT M, FELDMAN M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(8): 103773.
[5]	EITENEYER N, BENDIG D, BRETTEL M. Social capital and the digital crowd: Involving backers to promote new product innovativeness[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(8): 103744.
[6]	MIRIC M, BOUDREAU K J, JEPPESEN L B. Protecting their digital assets: The use of formal & informal appropriability strategies by App developers[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(8): 103738.
[7]	SHAIKH M, LEVINA N. Selecting an open innovation community as an alliance partner: Looking for healthy communities and ecosystems[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(8): 103766.
[8]	WANG W, MAHMOOD A, SISMEIRO C, et al. The evolution of equity crowdfunding: Insights from co-investments of angels and the crowd[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(8): 103727.
[9]	张超, 陈凯华, 穆荣平. 数字创新生态系统: 理论构建与未来研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(3): 1.
[10]	SECUNDO G, SHAMS S M R, NUCCI F. Digital technologies and collective intelligence for healthcare ecosystem: Optimizing Internet of Things adoption for pandemic management[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, S0148296321000400.
[11]	陈凯华, 冯泽, 孙茜. 创新大数据, 创新治理效能和数字化转型[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2021, 32(6): 1-12.
[12]	柳卸林, 魏江, 戎珂. 专稿:数字时代的创新生态[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(6): 961.
[13]	POHLE J, THIEL T. Digital sovereignty[J]. Internet Policy Review, 2020, 9(4).
[14]	AVILA PINTO R. Digital sovereignty or digital colonialsim[J]. SUR-Int'l J. on Hum Rts., 2018, 15: 15.
[15]	HENFRIDSSON O, BYGSTAD B. The Generative Me-chanisms of Digital Infrastructure Evolution[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2013, 37(3): 907-931.
[16]	BRAA, HANSETH, HEYWOOD, et al. Developing Health Information Systems in Developing Countries: The Flexible Standards Strategy[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31(2): 381.
[17]	HANSETH O, JACUCCI E, GRISOT M, et al. Reflexive Standardization: Side Effects and Complexity in Standard Making[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2006, 30(3): 563-581.
[18]	HANSETH O, BYGSTAD B. Flexible generification: ICT standardization strategies and service innovation in health care[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2015, 24(6): 645-663.
[19]	LATOUR B. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society[M]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1987.
[20]	AANESTAD M, JENSEN T B. Building nation-wide information infrastructures in healthcare through modular implementation strategies[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2011, 20(2): 161-176.
[21]	PIPEK V, WULF V. Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2009, 10: 28.
[22]	VAAST E. A Review of: “Information and Communication Technology in Organizations: Adoption, Implementation, Use and Effects”[J]. The Information Society, 2006, 22(5): 371-372.
[23]	BECKERT J. Agency, Entrepreneurs, and Institutional Change. The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations[J]. Organization Studies, 1999, 20(5): 777-799.
[24]	CHILD J. Structure, Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect[J]. Organization Studies, 1997, 18(1): 43-76.
[25]	BROADBENT M, WEILL P, ST CLAIR D. The Implications of Information Technology Infrastructure for Business Process Redesign[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1999:159-182.
[26]	JAIN G, PAUL J, SHRIVASTAVA A. Hyper-personalization, co-creation, digital clienteling and transformation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 124: 12-23.
[27]	SADREDDIN A, CHAN Y E. Pathways to developing information technology-enabled capabilities in born-digital new ventures[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2023, 68: 102572.
[28]	SJÖDIN D, PARIDA V, PALMIÉ M, et al. How AI capabilities enable business model innovation: Scaling AI through co-evolutionary processes and feedback loops[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 134: 574-587.
[29]	王飞跃. 平行控制与平行管理[EB/OL]. (2018-09-27)[2020-08-27]. http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-2374-1137339.html.
[30]	王飞跃, 王晓, 袁勇, 等. 社会计算与计算社会:智慧社会的基础与必然[J]. 科学通报, 2015, 60(Z1): 460-469.
[31]	KÖ A, SZABÓ I B, et al. Digital & co-gnitive corporate reality[J]. Infocommunication Journal, 2023(Specia): 2-10.
[32]	张玉宏, 秦志光, 肖乐. 大数据算法的歧视本质[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2017, 33(5): 81-86.

数字社会的技术基础设施、运行逻辑和治理现代化

Digital Society: Technical Infrastructure, Operating Logic and Modernization of Governance

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 32

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周小军, 佟梓赫, 史广军, 丛培民. 孜孜不倦累足成步中国科学院管理信息化发展的探索与启示——写在中国科学院计算机网络信息中心成立三十周年之际[J]. 数据与计算发展前沿, 2025, 7(3): 30-39.
[2]	李洪涛,张菲,隆云滔. 国际数字贸易规则助力中小企业数字化转型——以DEPA数字贸易规则为例[J]. 数据与计算发展前沿, 2022, 4(6): 67-76.