Research on the Construction Method of Basic Research Competitiveness Platform

doi:10.11871/jfdc.issn.2096-742X.2023.06.002

Abstract

Abstract:

[Background] The competitiveness of basic research is the core element reflecting the scientific and technological innovation ability of countries, regions, institutions, disciplines, and talents. [Objective] In order to track and judge the competitiveness of basic research in China, we design a basic research competitiveness platform, and find the development track of the competitiveness of basic research in various regions and institutions in China. [Methods] The overall architecture of the platform includes infrastructure layer, data system layer, data analysis layer, and application service layer. The data system layer has established a data system and evaluation indicators based on NSFC fundings, academic papers, ESI, invention patents, innovation platforms, national science and technology awards, and high-end talents. The data analysis layer constructs the Basic Research Competitive Index, carries out overall analysis, provincial analysis, and institutional analysis of China's basic research competitiveness, and uses natural language processing technology to achieve semantic knowledge services. The application service layer has built a basic research competitiveness platform, which provides six functional service modules, including interactive retrieval, all-around data display, special research, analysis and evaluation, research report, and personal center. [Results] The basic research competitiveness platform uses the BRCI model and data mining methods to better organize a large number of multi-source heterogeneous scientific and technological data, to intuitively show the development status and trend of the basic research competitiveness of various regions and institutions in China, and to provide support and assistance for the accurate decision-making of basic research in China.

Key words: basic research, basic research competitive index, data system, evaluation index, knowledge service, NSFC

LI Zhenzhen, ZHONG Yongheng, WANG Hui, LIU Jia, SUN Yuan. Research on the Construction Method of Basic Research Competitiveness Platform[J]. Frontiers of Data and Computing, 2023, 5(6): 9-19, https://cstr.cn/32002.14.jfdc.CN10-1649/TP.2023.06.002.

Figures/Tables 6

References 22

[1]	梁宗正, 闫金定, 张月. 中国基础研究发展现状与对策分析——基于2005—2019年中国科学十大进展[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 62(4): 15-20
[2]	中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[EB/OL].[2021-03-13]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/13/content_5592681.htm.
[3]	中国科学院. 一图读懂: 中国科学院“基础研究十条”[EB/OL].[2021-11-25]. https://www.cas.cn/gd/202111/t20211125_4815846.shtml.
[4]	俞立平, 程凯林, 庞如超. 中国基础研究论文时空分布演变与政策研究——把论文写在祖国大地上的思考[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(5): 44-48
[5]	钟永恒, 邢霞, 刘佳, 等. 2006—2016年我国省域基础研究竞争力分析——基于国家自然科学基金[J]. 科技管理研究, 2017, 37(24): 1-9.
[6]	郝红全, 赵英弘, 郑知敏, 等. 2021年度国家自然科学基金项目申请、评审与资助工作综述[J]. 中国科学基金, 2022, 36(1): 3-6.
[7]	赵英弘, 郑知敏, 郝红全, 等. 2020年度国家自然科学基金项目申请、评审与资助工作综述[J]. 中国科学基金, 2021, 35(1): 12-15.
[8]	钟永恒, 芦楚屹, 刘佳, 等. “双一流”高校基础研究竞争力分析——基于国家自然科学基金[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(20): 85-90.
[9]	夏新曙, 谢若晖, 郭烽丽. 我国师范院校的基础研究竞争力——基于国家自然科学基金面上项目信息[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(6): 17-27.
[10]	魏鑫, 汪洋. 科技竞争力评估体系研究与实践[J]. 数据与计算发展前沿, 2021, 3(1): 74-87.
[11]	姚畅, 王晓帆, 杜一, 等. 国家自然科学基金大数据知识管理服务平台总体方案及关键技术研究[J]. 中国科学基金, 2019, 33(1): 55-61.
[12]	崔海媛, 聂华, 罗鹏程, 等. 资助机构开放获取知识库研究与构建——以国家自然科学基金基础研究知识库为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(11): 45-54. doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.11.006
[13]	周园春, 常青玲, 杜一. SKS: 一种科技领域大数据知识图谱平台[J]. 数据与计算发展前沿, 2019, 1(5): 82-93.
[14]	吴思竹, 钱庆, 周伟, 等. 面向人口健康领域科研项目数据汇交的数据仓储设计与实现[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(12): 2-13.
[15]	胡吉颖, 谢靖, 钱力, 等. 基于知识图谱的科技大数据知识发现平台建设[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(1): 55-62.
[16]	任志宽, 谈力, 李妍. 广东基础研究竞争力评价及面向2035年的政策取向[J]. 科技创新发展战略研究, 2020, 4(5): 56-62.
[17]	张艺, 孟飞荣. 海洋战略性新兴产业基础研究竞争力发展态势研究——以海洋生物医药产业为例[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(16): 67-76.
[18]	钟永恒, 王辉, 刘佳, 等. 中国基础研究竞争力报告2021[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022: 1-10.
[19]	李兴奇, 高晓红. 服从不同分布数据的无量纲化方法研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(10): 31-36.
[20]	ZHANG M, LI X, YUE S, et al. An Empirical Study of TextRank for Keyword Extraction[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8:178849-178858. doi: 10.1109/Access.6287639
[21]	BAEK JW., CHUNG KY. Multimedia recommendation using Word2Vec-based social relationship mining[J]. Multimed Tools Appl, 2021, 80:34499-34515. doi: 10.1007/s11042-019-08607-9
[22]	HANIFI M, CHIBANE H, HOUSSING R, et al. Problem formulation in inventive design using Doc2vec and Cosine Similarity as Artificial Intelligence methods and Scientific Papers[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2022, 109: 104661. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104661