| [1] |
CASINO F, LYKOUSAS N, KATOS V, et al. Unearthing malicious campaigns and actors from the blockchain DNS ecosystem[J]. Computer Communications, 2021, 179: 217-230.
doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2021.08.023
|
| [2] |
ZHAUNIAROVICH Y, KHALIL I, YU T, et al. A survey on malicious domains detection through DNS data analysis[J]. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 2018, 51(4): 1-36.
|
| [3] |
AL-MASHHADI S, MANICKAM S. A brief review of blockchain-based DNS systems[J]. International Journal of Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, 2020, 10(4): 420-432.
doi: 10.1504/IJITST.2020.108134
|
| [4] |
YANG G, TRINH P, SERIKYAKU A, et al. Blockchain-Based Decentralized Domain Name System[C]// Proceedings of the 26th ACM Annual Conference on Cybersecurity & Information Technology Education. 2025: 267-274.
|
| [5] |
JEON J, PARK S. A Survey on Traditional DNS and Blockchain-Based DNS: Comparative Analysis, Challenges, and Future Directions[J]. Applied Sciences, 2026, 16(2): 598.
doi: 10.3390/app16020598
|
| [6] |
DIVAKARLA U, CHANDRASEKARAN K. D-dns: A decentralized domain name system on the blockchain: Implementation and assessment[C]// 2024 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Distributed Systems Security (ICBDS). IEEE, 2024: 1-7.
|
| [7] |
DOTAN M, PIGNOLET Y A, SCHMID S, et al. Survey on blockchain networking: Context, state-of-the-art, challenges[J]. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 2021, 54(5): 1-34.
|
| [8] |
HASSANZADEH-NAZARABADI Y, KÜPÇÜ A, ÖZKASAP Ö. LightChain: Scalable DHT-based blockchain[J]. IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems, 2021, 32(10): 2582-2593.
doi: 10.1109/TPDS.2021.3071176
|
| [9] |
JIN L, HAO S, HUANG Y, et al. DNSonChain: Delegating privacy-preserved DNS resolution to blockchain[C]// 2021 IEEE 29th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP). IEEE, 2021: 1-11.
|
| [10] |
NAKAMOTO S. BITCOIN: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system[J]. Decentralized Business Review, 2008: 21260.
|
| [11] |
MAO Y, DEB S, VENKATAKRISHNAN S B, et al. Perigee: Efficient peer-to-peer network design for blockchains[C]// Proceedings of the 39th Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. 2020: 428-437.
|
| [12] |
ZHOU M, ZENG L, HAN Y, et al. Mercury: Fast transaction broadcast in high performance blockchain systems[C]// IEEE INFOCOM 2023-IEEE conference on computer communications. IEEE, 2023: 1-10.
|
| [13] |
HAO W, ZENG J, DAI X, et al. BlockP2P: Enabling fast blockchain broadcast with scalable peer-to-peer network topology[C]// International Conference on Green, Pervasive, and Cloud Computing. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 223-237.
|
| [14] |
HAO W, ZENG J, DAI X, et al. Towards a trust-enhanced blockchain P2P topology for enabling fast and reliable broadcast[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2020, 17(2): 904-917.
doi: 10.1109/TNSM.2020.2980303
|
| [15] |
QIU H, JI T, ZHAO S, et al. A geography-based p2p overlay network for fast and robust blockchain systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2022, 16(3): 1572-1588.
|
| [16] |
Buterin V. Ethereum white paper[J]. GitHub repository, 2013, 1(22-23): 5-7.
|
| [17] |
ROHRER E, TSCHORSCH F. Kadcast: A structured approach to broadcast in blockchain networks[C]// Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies. 2019: 199-213.
|
| [18] |
ROHRER E, TSCHORSCH F. Kadcast-NG: A structured broadcast protocol for blockchain networks[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2023, 31(6): 3269-3283.
doi: 10.1109/TNET.2023.3279897
|
| [19] |
WANG X, JIANG X, LIU Y, et al. Data propagation for low latency blockchain systems[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2022, 40(12): 3631-3644.
doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2022.3213330
|
| [20] |
ZHENG R, LUO H, SUN G, et al. DHBN: An efficient broadcast protocol for blockchain networks in highly dynamic heterogeneous environment[C]// 2024 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). IEEE, 2024: 1-6.
|
| [21] |
SHEN T, SUN Q, ZHANG C, et al. SEKad: a scalable protocol for blockchain networks with enhanced broadcast efficiency[J]. Cluster Computing, 2024, 27(3): 3481-3498.
doi: 10.1007/s10586-023-04158-9
|
| [22] |
KALODNER H A, CARLSTEN M, ELLENBOGEN P M, et al. An Empirical Study of Namecoin and Lessons for Decentralized Namespace Design[C]// WEIS. 2015, 1(1): 1-23.
|
| [23] |
ISOBE K, EISENBARTH J P, KONDO D, et al. A Deeper Grasp of Handshake: A Thorough Analysis of Blockchain-based DNS Records[C]// 2024 6th Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS). IEEE, 2024: 1-10.
|
| [24] |
XIA P, WANG H, YU Z, et al. Ethereum name service: the good, the bad, and the ugly[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.05185, 2021.
|
| [25] |
BENSHOOF B, ROSEN A, BOURGEOIS A G, et al. Distributed decentralized domain name service[C]// 2016 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW). IEEE, 2016: 1279-1287.
|
| [26] |
JEON J, PARK S. Setonix: Blockchain-Based Hierarchy Domain Name System for Web3[J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(23): 11213.
doi: 10.3390/app142311213
|
| [27] |
ITO D, TAKATA Y, KUMAGAI H, et al. Investigations of top-level domain name collisions in blockchain naming services[C]// Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024. 2024: 2926-2935.
|
| [28] |
BALKIĆ Z, ŠOŠTARIĆ D, HORVAT G. GeoHash and UUID identifier for multi-agent systems[C]// KES International Symposium on Agent and Multi-Agent Systems:Technologies and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 290-298.
|
| [29] |
MAYMOUNKOV P, MAZIERES D. Kademlia: A peer-to-peer information system based on the xor metric[C]// International workshop on peer-to-peer systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002: 53-65.
|
| [30] |
Really Free GeoIP. Really free geoip[EB/OL]. [2025-09-09]. https://reallyfreegeoip.org/.
|
| [31] |
RAHMADIKA S, NOH S, KWEKA B J. The Dilemma of Parameterizing Propagation Time in Blockchain P2P Network[J]. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 2020, 16(3).
|