Development and Practice of Learning Management System in Large-Scale Organizations: A Technological Evolution Perspective

doi:10.11871/jfdc.issn.2096-742X.2025.03.008

Abstract

Abstract:

[Objective] This paper is to analyze the technological and modal characteristics of online learning across its developmental stages and evaluate the innovative value of a self-developed platform. [Methods] Through literature review, case comparison, and technical analysis of platforms, the study traces the evolution of online learning from Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) to AI-enhanced stages, validating technical adaptability via a self-developed platform. [Results] Technological evolution has advanced from the single-medium interaction of CAI to AI-driven adaptive learning, with platform technologies achieving multi-device integration (e.g., responsive design, cross-platform compatibility). Content production has shifted toward micro-learning modules and personalized recommendations, while learning theories transitioned from behaviorism to learner-centered constructivism. The self-developed platform demonstrates advantages in multi-device adaptability, intelligent operations, and personalized learning pathways, addressing lifelong learning demands. [Conclusions] Online learning is advancing toward intelligence and social interactivity, with technology-education integration as a main trend. The self-developed platform provides an efficient solution for the industry through technical innovation.

Key words: online learning, technological evolution, multi-device integration, personalized learning, AI-enhanced education

ZHAO Yixia, XIONG Ying, WANG Runqiang, LIU Yang, TAO Yiyuan. Development and Practice of Learning Management System in Large-Scale Organizations: A Technological Evolution Perspective[J]. Frontiers of Data and Computing, 2025, 7(3): 94-110, https://cstr.cn/32002.14.jfdc.CN10-1649/TP.2025.03.008.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

References 36

[1]	SIMA V, GHEORGHE I G, SUBIć J, et al. Influences of the industry 4.0 revolution on the human capital development and consumer behavior: A systematic review[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(10): 4035.
[2]	URDANETA-PONTE M C, MéNDEZ-ZORRILLA A, OLEAGORDIA-RUIZ I. Lifelong learning courses recommendation system to improve professional skills using ontology and machine learning[J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(9): 3839.
[3]	World Economic Forum. The Future of Jobs Report 2020[R]. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020.
[4]	HALEEM A, JAVAID M, QADRI M A, et al. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review[J]. Sustainable operations and computers, 2022, 3: 275-285.
[5]	陈耀华, 毕家娟, 陈琳. 人类教育技术万年演进主脉络[J]. 电化教育研究, 2025, 46(3): 122-128. DOI:10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2025.03.017.
[6]	深度融合: 无处不在的变革——《无限的可能: 世界高等教育数字化发展报告(2023)》节选一[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2024, 30(1): 6-17.
[7]	马克·布朗, 埃蒙·科斯特洛, 恩达·唐龙, 等. 影响在线学习的五大趋势: 从多焦点视角看未来可能发展[J]. 中国远程教育, 2022, (6): 21-35+76-77. DOI:10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2022.06.003.
[8]	ALENEZI M, WARDAT S, AKOUR M. The need of integrating digital education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(6): 4782.
[9]	SINGH V, THURMAN A. How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018)[J]. American journal of distance education, 2019, 33(4): 289-306.
[10]	BRADLEY V M. Learning Management System (LMS) use with online instruction[J]. International Journal of Technology in Education, 2021, 4(1): 68-92.
[11]	赵以霞, 金昆, 郑晓欢, 等. 2018年中国科学院继续教育网科研人员在线学习数据集[J]. 中国科学数据(中英文网络版), 2019, 4(3): 162-170.
[12]	FLETCHER-FLINN C M, GRAVATT B. The efficacy of computer assisted instruction (CAI): A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of educational computing research, 1995, 12(3): 219-241.
[13]	SkINNER B F. Teaching machines[J]. Scientific American, 1961, 205(5): 90-106.
[14]	RISK A N A. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform[J]. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1983.
[15]	VLADOIU M. Open courseware initiatives-after 10 years[C]// 2011 RoEduNet International Conference 10th Edition:Networking in Education and Research, IEEE, 2011: 1-6.
[16]	JOHNSTONE S M. Open educational resources serve the world[J]. Educause Quarterly, 2005, 28(3): 15.
[17]	BRANDL K. Review of are you ready to“Moodle”?[J]. Language Learning & Technology, 2005, 9(2), 16-23.
[18]	ABERDOUR M. Open source learning management systems[J/OL]. Epic White Paper, 2007, 12: 2022. www.epic.co.uk/content/news/oct_07/whitepaper.Pdf.
[19]	O'reilly T. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software[J]. International Journal of Digital Economics, 2007, 65(1): 17-37.
[20]	BELL F. Connectivism: a network theory for teaching and learning in a connected world[J]. Educational Developments, The Magazine of the Staff and Educational Development Association, 2009, 10(3): 14-16.
[21]	PAWLOWSKI J M, BICK M. Open educational resources[J]. Business & information systems engineering, 2012, 4: 209-212.
[22]	KASIM N N M, KHALID F. Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the higher education institution context: A systematic review[J]. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2016, 11(6): 55-61.
[23]	LLANTOS O E, ESTUAR M R J E. my. eskwela: Designing an enterprise learning management system to increase social network and reduce cognitive load[J]. Procedia computer science, 2018, 138: 595-602.
[24]	GULZAR Z, LEEMA A A. Sharablecontent Object Reference Model: An Overview[C]// National Conference on Computing Technologies Todays and Beyond (NCCTTB’15), 2015: 71-75.
[25]	DIAS B D, DINIZ J A, HADJILEONTIADIS L J. Towards an intelligent Learning Management System under blended learning[J]. Trends, Profiles and Modeling Perspectives. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, 2014, 59: 1-243.
[26]	PAPPANO L. The Year of the MOOC[J]. The New York Times, 2012, 2(12): 2012.
[27]	OKTAVIA T, PRABOWO H, SUPANGKAT S H. The comparison of MOOC (massive open online course) platforms of edx and coursera (study case: Student of programming courses)[C]// 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), IEEE, 2018: 339-344.
[28]	MIHAI O, VLAD M, RADU V. Technical analysis of MOOCs[J]. Tem Journal, 2015, 4(1): 60-72.
[29]	DA SILVA A G, SANTOS A M, COSTA F A, et al. Enhancing MOOC videos: Design and production strategies[C]. Research Track, 2016: 106-121.
[30]	KESIM M, ALTıNPULLUK H. A theoretical analysis of MOOCs types from a perspective of learning theories[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 186: 15-19.
[31]	FOX A. From moocs to spocs[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2013, 56(12): 38-40.
[32]	JUHASZ A, BALSAMO A. An idea whose time is here: FemTechNet, a Distributed Online Collaborative Course (DOCC)[J]. Ada: a Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 2012, (1): 1-8.
[33]	赵以霞, 金昆. 科技工作者培训需求调查与分析[J]. 中国科学数据(中英文网络版), 2019, 4(2): 180-187.
[34]	WU W H, WU Y C J, CHEN C Y, et al. Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis[J]. Computers & education, 2012, 59(2): 817-827.
[35]	CHEN L, CHEN P, LIN Z. Artificial intelligence in education: A review[J]. Ieee Access, 2020, 8: 75264-75278.
[36]	张奇, 熊英, 张思思, 等. 中科院继续教育平台使用现状的分析[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2021, (1): 72-80.

排名	LMS	特征
1	TalentLMS	混合学习
		自定义门户
		综合工具集
		支持交易
		企业级
2	SkyPrep	通知消息
		实时学习报告
		APP
		提示合规
3	Coassemble	自定义模板
		强大的报告功能
		富媒体支持
		移动端优化集成
		高效省时
		快速响应
4	Absorb LMS	预置课程
		学习者为中心
		更多协作学习
		智能管理模块
		课程交易
5	Graphy	快速创建课程
		支持对接市场
		支持云端和安卓
		顶级安全保障

学习模式	规模	时长	参与人员	频率
出访交流	个人	1个月~1年	外部机构	少
国际会议	百人以上	3天左右	国际同行	较多
学术年会	百人以上	3~5天	国内专家	每年1次
学术报告	数十人	0.5天左右	国内外专家	不定期
论坛沙龙	20人	0.5天左右	专家同行	定期
项目研讨	人数较少	0.5天左右	同项目人员	按需
组会	人数较少	0.5天左右	同课题组人员	定期，周或月
培训班	人数不定	1~5天左右	同类工作人员	按需
自学	个人	不定	自驱动	按需
在线学习	个人	不定	自驱动	按需